Case of 30 pedophiles – Part 2: EXCLUSIVE LEAK: A transcript of a hearing to remove a publication ban of the names of 30 pedophile witnesses from Judge Michal Brent’s Courtroom. Attorney Roy Los claimed that if Susie Ozzini Arnia deserves a referendum on sex and appointments – then pedophiles deserve it too.
Reporter: Yehonatan Kapach
Following our previous article on the 30 pedophiles who complained about extortion and received from the Central District Attorney’s Office a “ZAP” (publication ban order) on their name. We are now exposing the transcript of the hearing with Judge Michal Burnett in Lod, which dealt with the question of whether to remove the publication ban order.
Judge Michal Burnett, issued a restraining order against 33 pedophiles
The seekers for the removal of the ZAP were Channel 13 by Adv. Tamir Glick and Maya Katz from the law firm Lieblich Mozer, the movement for the Judiciary quality (of justice) Movement in Israel through CEO Ariel Formanovsky and Adv. Zehava Gur is a mother who fears that her children will meet pedophiles in online chats.
It should be noted that Adv. The newspaper systems have always sent Tamir Glick to request the removal of advertising bans, but he almost always fails because his arguments are weak and recycled, and the judges do not put a dent in him. Too bad. A cute man with a lot of goodwill, but with friendship, nothing is taken out in a court in Israel-Sodom.
Adv represented the defendant in the extortion of Elad Ben-Nun. After the defendant dumped the public defender, David Forer is good that he is.
Judge Michal Burnett heard arguments at length and did not give a decision on the spot. Attorney Roi Loos and his subordinate Osherat Bachar argued that Judge Yitzhak Amit ruled in the Efi Naveh case – sex and appointments that a private person like Susie Ozsini Arnia has a right to privacy (even though she is suspected of sexual bribery), as opposed to a public figure like Judge Etty Kreif. And shed her blood. Based on this, it is claimed that the pedophiles are in the same status as Susie Ozzini Arnia as “private individuals.” It should be noted that Susie was not a private woman and Judge Yitzhak Amit lied. She had status in the Bar Association as an attorney for the False Complaints Committee and a representative of the Bar in the Knesset and was also a candidate for the Likud primaries – that is, she is a political figure.
Admittedly, we did not understand this diagnosis. Susie Ozzini Arnia did not testify to the police as a complainant. She was questioned as a suspect in sexual bribery, so what does that have to do with the 30 pedophiles who testified at the police and in court as “victims of crime” ??? On the other hand, the pedophiles are also victims of crime (there was an extortion attempt). Still, an independent offense attributed to them was discovered here, an effort to coax a minor into sex for pay or without pay.
Dual status – the witness is both a victim and a criminal.
This is precisely the point: the prosecution decides what the classification of witnesses is, and when it does decide, it does not want to be disturbed, nor is it willing to hear about other options. Here indeed, some pedophiles are in the status of victims of extortion, but they are also in the position of sex offenders themselves. Therefore, the obligatory conclusion is that whoever has a dual-level – also a victim of an offense but at the same time is a criminal himself, does not deserve to receive the promised conditions for a “victim of an offense” and does not deserve a ban on publication in his name, nor does he deserve to be considered Private figure or public figure. That is, the status of a sex offender should prevail over the status of a crime victim, and then the conclusion will be published!
Status changes – the witness begins as a victim but ends as a criminal.
By the way, this is the same problem of mental outbursts in the State Attorney’s Office regarding “changing status.” For example, when a woman files a complaint with the police against a man, for example, rape or indecent act, she is indeed legally entitled to a publication ban in her name in the status of a victim, unless she is willing to be exposed.
But if it is determined that she is a false complainant and her complaint is rejected, closed, or shelved (and does not need the words “false complaint,” the acquittal is enough), then the “status” of that woman changes, the status of victim changes because she is no longer a victim, it disappears, and the rate Hers becomes the status of a criminal who has committed an offense of passing false information to the police.
Yet even in such cases, the prosecution refuses to change the status of that lying scoundrel and reveal her name, even though she no longer complains about a sexual offense. He has become a ” false complainant” In a sex offense “- that is, a criminal.
A good word about Michal Burnett and the insulting offense committed by Maor Tzur on the judge
Judge Michal Burnett conducted the hearing on the removal of the ZAP in an impressive and dignified manner. She also scheduled a hearing as soon as possible, which should be credited to her. It is unknown if she dares to go against the prosecution and remove the ZAP.
But what is disgusting is the condescending behavior of the reporter Maor Tzur who revealed the affair. He did not come to the hearing at all and immediately afterward issued a slanderous tweet against the judge as if she was responsible for the ZAP and that she was responsible for one of the low points of the justice system.
This tweet is an offense of contempt of court and suspicion of the judiciary. The judge is not responsible for the CPA. Those responsible for this are attorneys Roi Loos and Mickey Poren in full cooperation with the garbage public defender who sold her client and did not oppose the CPA, nor did she release it to the media.
Tamir Glick Every time a newspaper wants to remove a publication ban, they send it and it fails.
Adv represented the defendant in the extortion of Elad Ben-Nun. After the defendant dumped the public defender, David Forer is good that he is.
Judge Michal Burnett heard arguments at length and did not give a decision on the spot. Attorney Roi Loos and his subordinate Asherat Bachar argued that Judge Yitzhak Amit ruled in the Efi Naveh case – sex and appointments that a private person like Susie Uzsini Arnia has a right to privacy (even though she is suspected of sexual bribery), as opposed to a public figure like Judge Etty Kreif. And shed her blood. Based on this, it is claimed that pedophiles are in the same status as Susie Uzzini Arnia as “private individuals.” It should be noted that Susie was not a private woman and Judge Yitzhak Amit lied. She had status in the Bar Association as an attorney for the False Complaints Committee and a representative of the Bar in the Knesset and was also a candidate for the Likud primaries – that is, she is a political figure.
Admittedly, we did not understand this diagnosis. Susie Uzzini Arnia did not testify to the police as a complainant. She was questioned as a suspect in sexual bribery, so what does that have to do with the 30 pedophiles who testified at the police and in court as “victims of crime”? On the other hand, pedophiles are also victims of crime (there was an extortion attempt). Still, an independent offense attributed to them was discovered here, an effort to coax a minor into sex for pay or without pay.
Dual status – the witness is both a victim and a criminal.
This is precisely the point: the prosecution decides what the classification of witnesses is, and when it does decide, it does not want to be disturbed, nor is it willing to hear about other options. Here indeed, some pedophiles are in the status of victims of extortion, but they are also in the position of sex offenders themselves. Therefore, the obligatory conclusion is that whoever has a dual-level – also a victim of an offense but at the same time is a criminal himself, does not deserve to receive the promised conditions for a “victim of an offense” and does not deserve a ban on publication in his name, nor does he deserve to be considered Private figure or public figure. That is, the status of a sex offender should prevail over the status of a crime victim, and then the conclusion will be published!
Status changes – the witness begins as a victim but ends as a criminal.
By the way, this is the same problem of mental outbursts in the State Attorney’s Office regarding “changing status.” For example, when a woman files a complaint with the police against a man, for example, rape or indecent act, she is indeed legally entitled to a publication ban in her name in the status of a victim, unless she is willing to be exposed.
But if it is determined that she is a false complainant and her complaint is rejected, closed, or shelved (and does not need the words “false complaint,” the acquittal is enough), then the “status” of that woman changes, the status of victim changes because she is no longer a victim, it disappears, and the rate Hers becomes the status of a criminal who has committed an offense of passing false information to the police.
Yet even in such cases, the prosecution refuses to change the status of that lying scoundrel and reveal her name, even though she no longer complains about a sexual offense. He has become a ” false complainant” In a sex offense “- that is, a criminal.
A good word about Michal Burnett and the insulting offense committed by Maor Tzur on the judge
Judge Michal Burnett conducted the hearing on the removal of the ZAP in an impressive and dignified manner. She also scheduled a hearing as soon as possible, which should be credited to her. It is unknown if she dares to go against the prosecution and remove the ZAP.
But what is disgusting is the condescending behavior of the reporter Maor Tzur who revealed the affair. He did not come to the hearing at all and immediately afterward issued a slanderous tweet against the judge as if she was responsible for the ZAP and that she was responsible for one of the low points of the justice system.
This tweet is an offense of contempt of court and suspicion of the judiciary. The judge is not responsible for the CPA. Those responsible for this are attorneys Roi Loos and Mickey Poren in full cooperation with the garbage public defender who sold her client and did not oppose the CPA, nor did she release it to the media.
This judge is not “signed to the low points of the justice system.” The one who signed the depression is the State Attorney’s Office. They decided who would get into the indictment and who would not. They did a behind-the-scenes combo with the pedophiles and promised them complete immunity… the judge complied with orders from the prosecution. This is not new. In almost 99% of the cases, the judges humiliate themselves before the trial because, in the Supreme Court, they are instructed to respect the “prosecution of the prosecution” for doing what pleases.
See Rafi Rotem’s case: The name of Judge Gontobnik in the district passed a critique of the prosecution’s discretion. The prosecution appealed, and the three clowns, Noam Solberg, Yosef Elron, and Alex Stein, reversed the decision and reprimanded Guntobnik. They ruled that no judge should criticize the prosecution’s discretion because the trial has a prerogative.
Therefore, it is clear that Michal Burnett did as commanded by the three clowns, Noam Solberg, Yosef Elron, and Alex Stein, and did not criticize the prosecution’s considerations in the case of the 30 pedophiles…
Maor Tzur wrote a piece of junk in which contempt of judges insulted Judge Michal Burnett
What Maor Tzur tweeted is a violation of the Penal Code “contempt of court.” Anyone who suspects the judiciary is a criminal and faces up to 3 years in prison. Judge Michal Burnett must file a complaint against Maor Tzur with the police about contempt and suspicion of the judiciary. He’s guilty.
It is not at all clear to us what the motives of Maor Tzur are? Why is he attacking the judge and not the lawyers? Who even leaked the story to him? Hopefully, in the coming days, the picture will clear up. What is certain is that Maor Tzur is a lowly self. Not the judge.
Notice the fantastic performance of Ariel Formanovsky.
Ariel is the father of a 7-year-old boy he has not seen in 5 years as the mother of this child, Odelia Avagi, abducted him to a battered women’s home, a woman to a woman in Jerusalem, eight days after she lost to Ariel in court. Instead of appealing her loss, she abducted the minor into the battered women’s home and openly admitted that she was not a battered woman and that Ariel had never beaten her.
Ariel Fornmanowski is A father who is cut off from his son for 5 years because of Elia Nuss.
The abducted woman is the director of the criminal section of the Supreme Court Secretariat, Odelia Evgi. In this case, the very entry of this woman to torpedo a joint custody judgment eight days after the loss in court makes her a criminal woman who also filed false complaints with the police (rejected) and also exploited state resources in favor of cynically beaten women for her egotistical needs (i.e., gave false information for admission to a daycare center without being a battered woman). The State Attorney’s Office still believes that such a person is entitled to the “right to privacy” and that her name should not be published…
Ariel Formanowski fights corruption in court proceedings.
The following is the request that generated the discussion:
The State Attorney’s Office’s response:
The following is the transcript of the hearing, which the reporter Maor Tzur did not attend on 8/16/2021:
The following is the request that generated the discussion :
! Faha 129 30 pedophiles 31 -7-2021
The State Attorney’s Office’s response :
State Attorney's Office response to the publication of 30 pedophiles Mickey Poren 5-8-2021The following are the minutes of the hearing that the reporter from Or Tzur did not have on 8/16/2021 :
[pdf-embedder URL = “https://ednakarnaval.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ Parshat-30-The Pedophiles-Protocol-State-of-Israel-N-Elad-Ben-Nun-Removal-Zap-16 -8-2021 .pdf ” title =” Parshat 30 The Pedophiles Protocol of the State of Israel v. Elad Ben-Nun
Credit goes to Ednakarnaval.com